ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2026
Harnessing Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Pathogenic Eradication and Tissue Regeneration.
Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ceria-Based Nanotherapeutics for Inflammatory Skin Disorders: From Design and Mechanisms to Advanced Delivery and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Printed Bone Implants: Smart Responsive Antibacterial Strategies and AI-Driven Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intelligent multimodal-energy-driven piezoelectric antibacterial platforms: From structural control to system-level diagnosis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Combating Bacterial Infection with Metabolism-Regulating Nanomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Electric-based dressing for wound management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing incidence of infections and impaired tissue healing underscores the urgent need for effective therapeutic strategies for antibacterial treatment and regenerative medicine. Piezoelectric catalytic therapy represents an innovative approach that converts mechanical energy into electrochemical energy, providing a versatile platform for biomedical applications. However, conventional piezoelectric materials face significant limitations, including poor biocompatibility and insufficient catalytic efficiency, restricting their clinical translation. Piezoelectric biomaterials, characterized by excellent biocompatibility and enhanced piezoelectric performance, have recently emerged as promising candidates to overcome these challenges. This review systematically summarizes the latest advancements in piezoelectric biomaterials designed for pathogenic eradication and tissue regeneration. We provide a comprehensive overview of piezoelectric biomaterial classifications, fundamental mechanisms of piezoelectric catalysis, and methods to enhance material properties. Furthermore, we explore current applications of piezoelectric biomaterials in antibacterial therapies and regenerative medicine. Finally, critical challenges and potential future directions in material optimization and clinical application are identified, aiming to stimulate further innovation and research in this transformative field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.