Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810039›Full record

ArticleSmall science2026

Enhancing the Outcome of Crystallographic Fragment Screening by Choosing the Optimal Protein Crystal Form.

Tatjana Barthel, Jan Wollenhaupt, Laila S Benz, Patrick Reinke, Linlin Zhang, Melanie Oelker, Frank Lennartz, Helena Taberman, Uwe Mueller, Alke Meents and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tatjana BarthelMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-3112
Jan WollenhauptMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Laila S BenzMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Patrick ReinkeBiomedical Research with X-rays (FS-BMX) Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Hamburg Germany.
Linlin ZhangInstitute of Molecular Medicine University of Lübeck Lübeck Schleswig-Holstein Germany.
Melanie OelkerMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Frank LennartzMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Helena TabermanMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Uwe MuellerMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.
Alke MeentsBiomedical Research with X-rays (FS-BMX) Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Hamburg Germany.
Rolf HilgenfeldInstitute of Molecular Medicine University of Lübeck Lübeck Schleswig-Holstein Germany.
Manfred S WeissMacromolecular Crystallography Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-7047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving health and quality of life in our society is a key focus of drug development. Methods for drug discovery are being optimized in multiple ways to reduce costs and timelines. Crystallographic fragment screening (CFS) is increasingly being employed as an early screening method in drug discovery projects. Here, we demonstrate that selecting the optimal protein crystal form can significantly impact hit rates. Two CFS campaigns are carried out against the two crystal forms of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease, using the same fragment library and an almost identical experimental setup. Although both crystal forms exhibit similar diffraction properties, the observed hit rates in the two campaigns differ significantly. A hit rate of 3% is determined for the monoclinic crystals, while a hit rate of 16% is observed for the orthorhombic crystals. These findings are consistent with the more open molecular packing in the orthorhombic crystals, where the solvent channels leading to the active sites are approximately twice the size of those in the monoclinic crystal form. Our results highlight the critical importance of the crystal form in a crystallographic screening, identifying it as one of the most important parameters to optimize when preparing a CFS campaign.

Indexed as

crystal formcrystallographic fragment screeningcrystal soakingdrug discoverymain proteaseSARS‐CoV‐2space group

Identifiers

PMID41810039
PMCPMC12970188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.