ReviewEco-Environment & Health2026
Health and environmental evidence, challenges, and sustainable strategies of Planetary Health Diet: A mixed-methods review.
Review in Eco-Environment & Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut Microbiome as a Mechanistic Link Between the Planetary Health Diet and Healthy Aging.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Editorial: Revolutionizing nutritional epidemiology: harnessing digital health, AI, and big data for population-level disease prevention and management.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Planetary Health Diet (PHD) was proposed by the Lancet Commission in 2019. It is a new way of eating that aims to improve both human health and the environment simultaneously. However, recent practice demonstrates persistent cognitive gaps in terms of systematic quantification of health benefits, robust evidence of environmental impacts, and region-specific implementation pathways. This study systematically integrates epidemiological evidence to clarify the associations between PHD and reduced risks of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and certain cancers. Additionally, the study talks about how it affects the demand for agricultural land, the stress on freshwater resources, the release of greenhouse gases, and the imbalance in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. The study elucidates various multidimensional obstacles to global PHD adoption, including limitations in natural resources, regional economic inequalities, scaling challenges in food technology innovation, and resistance to cultural and intergenerational transmission. To tackle these issues, the study proposes a four-dimensional synergistic approach: encouraging innovation in food production systems, creating fair food distribution systems, building policy intervention toolkits, and designing behavioral incentives. These evidence-based solutions offer both theoretical foundations and actionable paradigms for sustainable food system transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.