ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Metagenomics enables parallel detection of 176 clinically relevant targets from faecal samples.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robust identification of pathogens is essential for managing patients with symptomatic infection, yet conventional diagnostic methods focus on a subset of the most prevalent pathogens and genes. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a powerful technology that can comprehensively and simultaneously assess a broader range of pathogens and genes in a sample. This study evaluates the clinical (22 targets), analytical (19 targets), and Methods: Diagnostic performance was evaluated relative to conventional pathology testing using 510 clinical faecal samples from patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms. Contrived samples were used to assess analytical performance and establish the assay's limit of detection by adding cells to a faecal matrix. Results: Clinical specificity was ≥96% (≥99% for all but Adenovirus F), and median pathogen sensitivity was 91%. VF and AMR gene detection was less sensitive (median 58.7%). The assay was highly reproducible in biological triplicates (27,656/27,808 calls concordant; 99.5%). Importantly, broad mNGS coverage increased diagnostic yield, with 256/510 (50.2%) samples containing one or more additional targets not reported by standard care, and 181/510 (35.5%) containing AMR genes, including carbapenemases. Conclusions: The faecal mNGS assay performed competitively with existing diagnostic techniques while substantially expanding actionable detection in a single assay. These results support stool mNGS as a high-yield second-line or syndromic test for gastrointestinal infection, enabling improved recognition of rare pathogens, co-infections, and resistance determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.