ArticleERJ open research2026
Multicentre field evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melting temperature signatures reveal occasional misclassification of low-level isoniazid resistance by Xpert MTB/XDR.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Molecular Diagnostic Tests and Emerging Tools for Tuberculosis and Drug Resistance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rapid detection of non-rifampicin resistant drug-resistant tuberculosis using Xpert MTB/XDR testing: Findings from a multisite drug-resistant tuberculosis case detection surge in Zambia.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization-endorsed Xpert MTB/XDR assay provides a rapid method to detect resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, injectables aminoglycosides and ethionamide, yet evaluation of its performance, particularly in endemic settings, remains limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicentre study (June 2017 to March 2021) in nine sub-Saharan African countries, enrolling adults with pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed by Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra. Xpert MTB/XDR results were compared to a World Health Organization-endorsed targeted next-generation sequencing reference used on the same sputum, with discordance resolved using whole genome sequencing and phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing when available. Diagnostic accuracy for each drug was calculated, also accounting for genotypic heteroresistance detection. Results: Among 1238 included patients, Xpert MTB/XDR demonstrated high specificity (≥98%) across all drugs yet showed variable sensitivity, detecting 606 out of 637 isoniazid-resistant (95%, 95% CI 94-97%), 22 out of 33 fluoroquinolones-resistant (67%, 95% CI 48-81%) and 159 out of 279 ethionamide-resistant (57%, 95% CI 51-63%) samples. The assay reliably detected most common resistance-conferring mutations, such as Conclusions: Xpert MTB/XDR offers rapid diagnosis of resistance with high specificity. While limitations in detecting low-frequency and off-target variants affect its sensitivity, most frequent, fixed in-target mutations are readily detected. Future studies should evaluate strategies to integrate Xpert MTB/XDR with other diagnostic approaches in national tuberculosis programmes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.