ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2026
Electrodermal Activity Responses as Predictor of Physiological and Emotional Responses to Different Visual Stimuli.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electrodermal activity (EDA) responses are characterized by fast fluctuations in skin conductance responses (SCRs), skin potential responses (SPRs), and skin susceptance responses (SSRs) triggered by various distinct stimuli. SCRs to various visual stimuli have been investigated in some studies, but not on SSRs and SPRs. This study evaluated the three EDA (SCRs, SSRs, and SPRs) scores to various visual (emotional) stimuli. Materials and Methods: EDA responses following five different visual stimuli were recorded from 40 healthy participants (20 male and 20 female) aged in the range 18-25 years (mean 19.75 years) simultaneously recorded at the same skin site. Visual stimuli were funny, sad, scary, nature, and romantic. Results: The obtained results indicated that the different visual stimuli caused significant ( Conclusions: EDA responses could be an important physiological measure, and EDA instruments might be used in diverse psychophysiological applications, including emotion recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.