ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2026
A Comparative Study of the Effect of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG With Dual Trigger in Poor Responder Poseidon Group 4 Patients in Antagonist IVF Cycles.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Decreased Ovarian Reserve (DOR) is a significant challenge in infertility treatment. This study, which compared the effects of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), holds promise for improving IVF outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial on 90 infertile women. An antagonist regimen was used, which included approximately 300 units of gonadotropins, consisting of 150 units of Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and 150 units of Synal-F. After administering a dose of Strotide injection followed by Decapeptyl and Ovitrelle injections, 12 hours later, a single HCG 5000-unit injection was administered, and 36 hours later, the puncture procedure was performed. Results: Although the frequency of chemical pregnancy, Implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy was higher in the Novel double trigger with delayed HCG group, and the frequency of zero oocytes and fetus was lower in this group, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study showed that using Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG, compared to Dual Trigger, did not significantly differ in the number of oocytes, embryos, or secondary pregnancy outcomes. These findings suggest that the Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG methods could be equally effective in improving IVF outcomes for poor responder patients, providing a potential alternative for ovarian stimulation in these cases and instilling optimism for the future of IVF treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.