Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809840›Full record

ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2026

The art of the clinical examination is still relevant in internal medicine at teaching hospitals in South Africa.

Mogamat-Yazied Chothia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mogamat-Yazied ChothiaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-1300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical examination has long been central to diagnostic reasoning and to cultivating core professional attributes in internal medicine training; however, the relevance of clinical examination has been increasingly questioned in an era in which rapid access to specialised investigations is expanding. In the Eastern Metropole of Cape Town, the 'decentralisation' of specialised investigations, particularly radiological imaging and point-of-care ultrasound, has made these tools readily accessible at peripheral hospitals. While diagnostic efficiency has improved at peripheral centres, this improvement has occurred alongside a reduced emphasis on fundamental bedside skills among internal medicine registrars at the tertiary level. At our tertiary centre, the overburdened internal medicine admissions area leaves little time for detailed history taking or comprehensive physical examination. Consequently, investigations performed at referring centres often precede bedside assessment at our centre. This trend risks eroding the core competencies within internal medicine training, including diagnostic reasoning, observational proficiency and elements of the hidden curriculum such as communication, rapport-building and professionalism. In South Africa's resource-constrained environment, in which clinicians often confront advanced disease and complex pathology, the clinical examination remains indispensable. Training programmes should reaffirm the vital role of clinical examination, ensuring that registrars in internal medicine maintain mastery of bedside assessment, rather than relying on special investigations. The art of clinical examination remains fundamental to good medical practice and should be actively preserved within teaching hospitals.

Indexed as

clinical medicineclinical reasoninginternal medicinespecialisationtraining

Identifiers

PMID41809840
PMCPMC12969667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.