Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Development and validation of a pathomics-driven machine learning model for individualized prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and early recurrence in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Jiaxian Yue, Jiaxiang Liu, Xiyu Kang, Pei Yuan, Wei Wang, Zhanyu Wang, Chao Shang, Qingyao Shang, Guangyu Li, Xubin Dong and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jiaxian Yue *Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiaxiang Liu *Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiyu Kang *Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Pei Yuan *Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei WangThorough Lab, Thorough Future, Beijing, China.
Zhanyu WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chao ShangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qingyao ShangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Guangyu LiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xubin DongDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tianxiao WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Dongmin YangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shuhao WangThorough Lab, Thorough Future, Beijing, China.
Chenxuan YangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianming YingDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype among women but has a modest response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Accurately predicting NAC efficacy and recurrence risk remains challenging, as conventional clinical and molecular markers have limited predictive power. Advances in digital pathology and artificial intelligence now enable quantitative pathomics analysis, offering new opportunities for precise prediction and prognostic assessment. Methods: In this retrospective study, 162 HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients treated with NAC between 2014 and 2021 were included. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained pretreatment biopsy slides were digitized and analyzed using Vision Transformer (ViT) and Unified Network for Image (UNI) deep learning models to extract pathomic features. Thirteen clinical variables were collected. After least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based feature selection, multiple machine learning models were developed for both response prediction and prognostic evaluation of recurrence, with performance evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, confusion matrix, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to rank the importance of features for each model. Results: The CatBoost model achieved the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.900 in training and 0.848 in validation) when a combination of clinical and pathomics-derived variables was used. Key predictive factors included Ki-67 expression, age, histological grade, PR status, and prominent pathomic features. A Kaplan-Meier survival plot indicated that regardless of stratification by MP grade or pCR status, there was no significant difference in recurrence status or survival outcomes between the two groups in this cohort. Furthermore, the recurrence models developed mainly using pathomics were strongly accurate for predicting 1-year recurrence (AUC = 0.907 in training and 0.769 in validation). Conclusions: Integrating pathomic features with clinical variables via machine learning enables robust pretreatment prediction of NAC efficacy and short-term recurrence in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. This approach has the potential to offer a clinically practical tool to optimize individualized therapy and improve patient management, highlighting the translational value of AI-powered digital pathology in breast cancer care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancerHR-positive/HER2-Negativemachine learningneoadjuvant chemotherapypathomicsprediction

Identifiers

PMID41809834
PMCPMC12967959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.