ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinical outcomes and survival in patients with NSCLC and EGFR exon 20 mutations: evidence from real-world clinical practice in a retrospective study in Galicia.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 (EGFR Ex20Ins) is rare and resistant to conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), limiting treatment options. This retrospective study in Galicia (Spain) evaluated the clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival of patients with NSCLC and EGFR Ex20Ins. Methods: Data from patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2023, confirmed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of serious adverse events were assessed. Results: Of the 43 patients in the present study, 39 had metastatic disease and were considered for survival analysis. Among patients with metastatic disease, the median OS was 14.6 months (95% CI: 7-20 months), and the median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI: 3-12 months) with first-line therapy (1L). Patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in the 1L achieved a median PFS of 9.8 months (95% CI: 3-27 months), whereas those receiving TKIs achieved a median PFS of 3.4 months (95% CI: 1-12 months). No significant differences in treatment response were found according to age or sex. Conclusions: The results show the limited effectiveness of TKIs in patients with EGFR Ex20Ins and highlight the need for specific therapies. Platinum-based chemotherapy performed better in preventing disease relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.