ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound optimized breast imaging reporting and data system category on the biopsy decision for non-mass breast lesions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) optimized Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) prediction model on the biopsy decision for non-mass breast lesions (NMLs). Methods: 148 NMLs histopathologically confirmed from 142 patients who underwent ultrasound (US) and CEUS examination were retrospectively enrolled. US and CEUS features were compared between malignant and benign NMLs. A CEUS-optimized BI-RADS category prediction model was developed using logistic regression. The diagnostic performance and impact on biopsy decision of US and CEUS-optimized BI-RADS category were compared. Results: Of 148 NMLs, 77 were malignant and 71 benign. CEUS features such as earlier wash-in, later wash-out, hyperenhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, enlarged enhancement extent, and crab claw-like enhancement were significantly associated with malignancy (P<0.05). The enlarged enhancement extent and crab claw-like enhancement were independent risk factors for malignancy (P<0.05). Using BI-RADS 4B as the cutoff, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosing NMLs increased from 53.2%, 63.4%, 61.2%, 55.6%, and 58.1% before optimization to 93.5%, 81.7%, 84.7%, 92.1%, and 87.8% after CEUS optimization, respectively. With BI-RADS 4A or 4B as the biopsy threshold, the biopsy rate, malignancy detection rate, and missed diagnosis rate were 100%, 52.03%, and 0% before optimization, changing to 75%, 66.67%, and 3.90% after optimization for 4A, respectively. The corresponding values for 4B were 45.95%, 60.29%, and 46.75% before optimization, and 57.43%, 84.71%, and 6.49% after optimization, respectively. Conclusion: The CEUS-optimized BI-RADS category prediction model could provide valuable guidance for biopsy decision-making in NMLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.