ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Development and validation of a biochemical recurrence risk assessment model for prostate cancer based on TCGA database.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in men worldwide. Approximately 30% of patients experience biochemical recurrence after radical treatment, leading to disease progression, increased treatment difficulty, and reduced survival rates. An accurate biochemical recurrence prediction model is required to assist in treatment decision-making. Therefore, we developed an effective assessment model using public databases. Methods: The clinical data of 404 prostate cancer cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were divided into training and validation sets (7:3 ratio). We developed a biochemical recurrence risk assessment model for prostate cancer based on training sets. DESeq2 was used to analyze differences between RNAs of prostate cancer in TCGA database, with thresholds of P<0.05, and |log Results: From TCGA data, 2,961 differential RNAs were identified. Of these, 502 RNAs were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence, 40 RNAs were selected via LASSO regression, and 10 RNAs were obtained through multifactor risk regression to construct a risk assessment model. The model showed strong predictive ability, with AUCs of 0.853 (training set) and 0.769 (validation set). The integrated model combined with clinical parameters had a better AUC of 0.869 in training and 0.774 for validation. Conclusions: This assessment model is a relatively accurate biochemical recurrence prediction tool for prostate cancer and can guide the treatment of prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.