ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
A few minutes of surgery for a lifetime of regret?-regret after vasectomy: prevalence and contributing factors.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contraception has consistently been a significant concern for couples, facilitating autonomy in family planning, a highly desired aspect for many. This responsibility predominantly falls on women, who often perceive it as burdensome. In this context, vasectomy, a straightforward, expedient, and dependable procedure, has gained popularity in France and other countries. This emerging trend necessitates an examination of the ethical considerations surrounding potential patient regret. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of regret among patients treated at our center and to analyze the factors contributing to this sentiment. Methods: After exclusions, a retrospective chart review was conducted on 274 patients who underwent vasectomy at our center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. The patients participated in semi-structured telephone interviews to assess their sociodemographic data and motivations. Results: The overall rate of regret was low at 2.2% (n=6). The primary reasons for regret included a change in partner (n=4), post-vasectomy pain syndrome (n=1), and reconsideration of parenthood (n=1). Men whose decision to undergo vasectomy was initiated by their partner were significantly more likely to experience regret (66.7% Conclusions: Although regret among men following vasectomy is relatively rare, it appears to be influenced by the decision-making process, which includes personal relationships. These findings emphasize the need to ensure autonomous decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.