Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809811›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026

A few minutes of surgery for a lifetime of regret?-regret after vasectomy: prevalence and contributing factors.

Arthur Galano, Xavier Tillou, Antoine Clergeau, Paul Neuville, Thibaut Waeckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arthur GalanoUrology and Transplantation Department, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.
Xavier TillouUrology and Transplantation Department, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-4156
Antoine ClergeauDepartment of Biology, Reproductive Biology Unit, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.
Paul NeuvilleDepartment of Urology, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Thibaut WaeckelUrology and Transplantation Department, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contraception has consistently been a significant concern for couples, facilitating autonomy in family planning, a highly desired aspect for many. This responsibility predominantly falls on women, who often perceive it as burdensome. In this context, vasectomy, a straightforward, expedient, and dependable procedure, has gained popularity in France and other countries. This emerging trend necessitates an examination of the ethical considerations surrounding potential patient regret. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of regret among patients treated at our center and to analyze the factors contributing to this sentiment. Methods: After exclusions, a retrospective chart review was conducted on 274 patients who underwent vasectomy at our center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. The patients participated in semi-structured telephone interviews to assess their sociodemographic data and motivations. Results: The overall rate of regret was low at 2.2% (n=6). The primary reasons for regret included a change in partner (n=4), post-vasectomy pain syndrome (n=1), and reconsideration of parenthood (n=1). Men whose decision to undergo vasectomy was initiated by their partner were significantly more likely to experience regret (66.7% Conclusions: Although regret among men following vasectomy is relatively rare, it appears to be influenced by the decision-making process, which includes personal relationships. These findings emphasize the need to ensure autonomous decision-making.

Indexed as

Contraceptionregretvasectomy

Identifiers

PMID41809811
PMCPMC12968907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.