Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809783›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026

A porcine

Zoe Williams, Cameron Sowter, Lorane Gaborit, Paul Bergamin, Steven Sowter, Lakal Dissabandara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zoe WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Wagga Wagga Base Hospital, Wagga Wagga, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-0752
Cameron SowterDepartment of Surgery, Wagga Wagga Base Hospital, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Lorane GaboritDepartment of Surgery, Wagga Wagga Base Hospital, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Paul BergaminDepartment of Surgery, Wagga Wagga Base Hospital, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Steven SowterDepartment of Surgery, Wagga Wagga Base Hospital, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Lakal DissabandaraSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Animal models provide useful adjuncts to technical skills training in surgery. Animal models are particularly useful for training basic emergency procedures, such as scrotal exploration and orchidopexy, where trainee exposure is limited. There is a scarcity of studies validating animal models for scrotal exploration and orchidopexy. Urology and general surgical trainees thereby have limited access to training opportunities in this procedure. In response to this gap in surgical education, we developed a porcine Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods prospective observational study. A scrotal surgery model was developed using porcine scrotal specimens. Eight junior surgical registrars or senior resident medical officers at Wagga Wagga Base Hospital participated in a half-day education session on scrotal exploration and orchidopexy led by a consultant urologist. Participants practiced procedural steps on the porcine model while receiving technical instruction from a urologist. At the conclusion of the session, participants' performances of scrotal exploration and orchidopexy on the porcine model were assessed for procedural competency using a bespoke assessment tool based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) for Surgical Residents template. Repeat assessment was performed at 2-8 weeks. Participant attitudes towards the porcine scrotal model as a surgical training tool were assessed in a bespoke 5-point Likert scale survey and free-text response. Descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis of free-text responses were performed. Results: All participants (n=8) achieved procedural competency (by performing all operative steps unprompted and with appropriate technique and skill) using the porcine model. At reassessment 2-8 weeks later, competency was retained by every participant. All participants reported the porcine model improved knowledge of anatomy, procedural steps, appropriate surgical tools, tissue handling techniques, strategies to address procedural difficulties, and personal perception of knowledge and technical skill in performing scrotal exploration and orchidopexy. Satisfaction with the model as a teaching aid was high, with all respondents' 5-point Likert scale animal model survey feedback reporting they were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the model. Limitations included the absence of bleeding, and size discrepancy between the model and human tissue. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the success of a novel porcine

Indexed as

scrotal explorationscrotal surgerysurgical educationsurgical modelSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID41809783
PMCPMC12968977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.