ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Toward practical screening of mortality risk: Insights from interpretable machine learning in NHANES.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficient community-based screening for individuals at high risk of mortality is a major public health challenge. While many predictors have been proposed, there is limited consensus on which factors are both robust and practical for population screening. This study applied interpretable machine learning to identify efficient predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a nationally representative cohort. Methods: We analyzed 9957 adults aged ≥40 years from NHANES 1999-2004 with linked mortality follow-up. A total of 134 demographic, lifestyle, and biomarker variables were evaluated across multiple algorithms. Model interpretability was assessed with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), and the prognostic implications of leading predictors were examined with Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Over 5 years, 1293 participants (13.0%) died. Across analytic approaches, age, troponin T (TNT), and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) consistently emerged as the most influential predictors. Survival analyses demonstrated significantly poorer outcomes among individuals with elevated TNT and NT-proBNP. A parsimonious five-variable model (age, TNT, NT-proBNP, physical activity, gender) retained good discrimination (AUC = 0.841) and calibration. Conclusions: A parsimonious set of five predictors-age, gender, physical activity, TNT, and NT-proBNP-enabled efficient mortality risk stratification in NHANES, supporting their potential role in practical community screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.