ArticleWorld journal of radiology2026
Interpretable radiomics model based on magnetic resonance imaging to predict responses to transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is important role for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, owing to the heterogeneity of HCC tumors, TACE efficacy varies among individual HCC patients. Accurate preoperative prediction of responses to TACE among HCC patients could guide the development of individualized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
aimTo investigate the predictive value of multiple-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features combined with clinical indices for the response to TACE among HCC patients and to develop an interpretable machine learning model.
methodsA total of 116 patients with HCC who underwent TACE were retrospectively enrolled. Patients in this study were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group at a ratio of 7:3. The response to TACE was evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Radiomic features were extracted from axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging, arterial phase and portal venous phase axial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to select the best radiomic features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to select clinical predictive factors that affect the response to TACE among patients with HCC. Logistic regression was used to construct a radiomic model of each sequence, a multiple-sequence MRI radiomics model, and a radiomic-clinical (RC) model. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The risk factors in the RC model were subsequently interpreted
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of the fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging, arterial-phase, portal-venous-phase, joint-radiomic model and RC model were 0.771, 0.668, 0.725, 0.845 and 0.929, respectively, in the training group and 0.705, 0.666, 0.675, 0.799 and 0.815, respectively, in the validation group. The clinical-radiomic model had the best predictive performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was used to illustrate the contribution of each feature in the RC model.
conclusionThe interpretable RC model could successfully stratify HCC patients into TACE responders and TACE nonresponders and serve as a potential tool to identify more appropriate HCC patients for TACE, thus sparing patients from receiving ineffective and unnecessary treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.