Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809642›Full record

ArticleIJID regions2026

Artificial intelligence for Africa: bridge or barrier for infectious disease control?

Francesco Branda, Ntuli A Kapologwe

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in IJID regions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco BrandaUnit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Ntuli A KapologweEast, Central and Southern Africa - Health Community (ECSA - HC), Arusha, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) for global health risks becoming a structural barrier in Africa if linguistic and cultural exclusions persist.•Dominant AI systems, trained on non-African languages, perform poorly in many local languages, widening health inequalities in infectious disease surveillance and control.•Locally developed, language-specific AI tools demonstrate superior performance in health communication compared with imported, non-contextualized models.•Creating effective AI for health in Africa requires investment in local data ecosystems, digital infrastructure, and participatory, epistemically just design.•Africa's linguistic diversity represents a strategic opportunity for innovation in cross-border disease surveillance and South-South technological collaboration.

Indexed as

AfricaArtificial intelligenceDigital health equityHealth systemsOne HealthStrengthening

Identifiers

PMID41809642
PMCPMC12969610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.