Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809603›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Phages as antimicrobials against multi-drug resistant bacteria.

Salomé Plat, Gisèle LaPointe, Lawrence Goodridge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salomé PlatDepartment of Food Science, Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Gisèle LaPointeDepartment of Food Science, Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Lawrence GoodridgeDepartment of Food Science, Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR) pose a major public health challenge. Their ability to exchange resistance genes through Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) promotes the appearance of resistant strains, limiting antibiotic treatments for infections caused by these MDR bacteria. Among alternative approaches, phage therapy stands out as a promising strategy that utilizes bacteriophages to specifically target and effectively eliminate bacteria. This narrative review provides an overview of the current knowledge on the use of whole bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents in human and veterinary medicine, as well as in the food industry whether used alone, in cocktails, or combined with antimicrobials. While whole phages offer high specificity and an efficient elimination of bacteria, their application is associated with several limitations, including their contribution to HGT, the emergence of bacterial resistance, their narrow host range, the immune recognition, and the difficulties posed by their regulation. To address these challenges, this review focuses on phage-derived enzymatically active proteins, such as endolysins and depolymerases, as alternative antimicrobial tools, used alone or in combination. These phage components, being smaller and structurally simpler than whole phages, behave more similarly to conventional antimicrobial compounds. They have so far presented a low risk of bacterial resistance appearance and less chance of immune response. In addition, their classification as antimicrobial enzymes or conventional biologics could facilitate regulatory approval by aligning with existing regulatory frameworks. A total of 40 studies were included in this narrative review, highlighting the outcomes of applications involving whole bacteriophages (

Indexed as

antimicrobialsbacteriophagesdepolymerasesendolysinsmulti-drug resistant bacteriaphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID41809603
PMCPMC12968171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.