ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Randomized double-blind clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of secondary prophylaxis with oral vancomycin versus placebo in the prevention of recurrence of
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05320068 (Phase III,randomized,double-blinded Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Vancomycin Vs Placebo in the Prevention of Recurrence of C.difficile Infection in Patients Under Treatment with Systemic Antibiotic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III,randomized,double-blinded Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Vancomycin Vs Placebo in the Prevention of Recurrence of C.difficile Infection in Patients Under Treatment with Systemic Antibiotic Therapy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secondary vancomycin prophylaxis during antibiotic re-exposure for the prevention of recurrentJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrence of Methods: PREVAN (NCT05320068) was a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Adults with documented CDI within the previous 180 days who required hospitalization and systemic antibiotics were randomized (2:1) to receive oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) or placebo for 10 days, stratified by type of index CDI episode. Primary endpoints were CDI recurrence within 60 days after end of therapy and CDI recurrence-free survival. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled (14 SPV; 7 placebo). Mean age was 73.5 years and 76.7% had malignancy and/or immunosuppression. CDI recurrence occurred in 5 patients (23.8%): 2 (14.3%) in the SPV group and 3 (42.9%) in the placebo group ( Conclusions: In high-risk patients with recent CDI requiring systemic antibiotics, SPV appeared safe and was associated with a clinically relevant reduction in recurrence, although the trial was underpowered. These findings support further adequately powered randomized studies to define the role of SPV in preventing CDI recurrence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.