ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
The augmented physician: AI and the future of clinical cognition.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medicine stands at a cognitive tipping point as the volume of biomedical information expands faster than clinicians can realistically monitor, synthesize, and apply new evidence in routine practice. Once a marker of scientific progress, this acceleration now challenges the foundations of clinical expertise, patient safety, and medical education. This Perspective examines the widening gap between evidence generation and evidence implementation, arguing that artificial intelligence should not replace clinicians but serve as a cognitive partner. Properly designed and ethically governed systems can assist clinicians by organizing and contextualizing large bodies of information, enabling greater focus on clinical judgment, empathy, and human connection. When integrated thoughtfully, artificial intelligence has the potential to strengthen patient engagement, reduce administrative burden, and support shared human and machine cognition in care delivery. Sustaining clinical excellence in an era of accelerating information growth will depend on embracing artificial intelligence as a collaborative tool and redefining how physicians learn, think, and care. The future of medicine will remain profoundly human, precisely because it is intelligently augmented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.