ReviewMethodsX2026
An in-depth analysis of UAV path planning, including procedures, algorithms, optimization models, and emerging challenges.
Review in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have emerged as valuable assets in modern surveillance, environmental monitoring, disaster response, and delivery systems. Their autonomy is built around effective path planning, which provides safe, energy-efficient, and goal-oriented navigation in complex, dynamic environments. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of UAV path planning research, encompassing classification techniques, heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms, and underlying problem models. It emphasizes significant contributions from traditional, hybrid, and AI-driven techniques while carefully highlighting upcoming issues, such as real-time processing, multi-UAV coordination, energy limitations, and environmental concerns. The study provides a detailed assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of significant algorithms, allowing for the identification of research gaps and future initiatives. This paper is an invaluable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to create robust, scalable, and adaptive UAV route planning systems appropriate for a wide range of mission-specific and real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.