ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2026
MEETING DATA COLLECTION GOALS QUICKER: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION TO REDUCE FIELDWORK DURATION IN A MIXED-MODE PANEL STUDY.
Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An experiment was implemented in the 2023 wave of a US household panel study to assess the effects of a shortened field period on data collection outcomes. Following the recent adoption of sequential mixed-mode designs by panel studies worldwide, it has been observed that interview completion for respondents offered the initial mode of web is faster compared to those initially offered the telephone. This study describes an experiment designed to evaluate whether the new mixed-mode designs can support an accelerated field period and achieve cost savings while still meeting fieldwork goals. We assessed a shorter field period of 20weeks against the standard 28-week field period and randomized study participants to each condition. The treatment group received accelerated fieldwork protocols over a 20-week data collection period, and a control group received the same protocols over the standard 28-week period. We compare the effect of the shortened duration on fieldwork outcomes, including response rates, sample composition, interviewer effort, time to interview completion, survey costs, and interview quality. We find that the accelerated protocol yields higher response rates, lower interviewer effort, and cost savings with no differences in sample composition or decrements to interview quality. We describe the strengths and limitations of the study and provide suggestions for future research on fieldwork duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.