Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809475›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of hepatology2026

Development and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict mortality in cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding.

Matheus Machado Rech, Leandro Luis Corso, Elisa Fioreze Dal Bó, Andressa Daiane Ferraza, Fernanda Tomé, Alana Zulian Terres, Rafael Sartori Balbinot, Raul Angelo Balbinot, Silvana Sartori Balbinot, Jonathan Soldera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matheus Machado RechSchool of Medicine, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Leandro Luis CorsoDepartment of Engineering, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Elisa Fioreze Dal BóSchool of Medicine, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Andressa Daiane FerrazaSchool of Medicine, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda ToméDepartment of Engineering, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Alana Zulian TerresDepartment of Clinical Gastroenterology, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Rafael Sartori BalbinotSchool of Medicine, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Raul Angelo BalbinotDepartment of Clinical Gastroenterology, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Silvana Sartori BalbinotDepartment of Clinical Gastroenterology, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.
Jonathan SolderaDepartment of Clinical Gastroenterology, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute esophageal variceal bleeding (AEVB) is a critical complication in patients with cirrhosis, associated with high mortality despite advancements in management. Traditional prognostic scores often lack predictive accuracy in this context.

aimTo develop, internally validate, and prospectively validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict 1-year mortality in patients with cirrhosis presenting with AEVB.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 94 patients treated between 2010 and 2016 was used to train ML models, incorporating 36 clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables. Four algorithms (generalized linear models, boosted generalized linear models, naive Bayes, random forests) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was prospectively validated in a cohort of 24 patients treated between 2017 and 2018. Performance metrics included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration

resultsThe random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96) during internal validation and demonstrated robust performance in the prospective cohort (AUC 0.88, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94). Calibration was excellent, with a low Brier score (0.12). The model was deployed as an online prediction tool.

conclusionThis ML model shows promise in improving mortality prediction for AEVB, potentially aiding timely clinical interventions and decision-making. Prospective validation underscores its generalizability and clinical utility. Future research should explore external validation in diverse settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCirrhosisEsophageal and gastric varicesHemorrhageMachine learningMortality

Identifiers

PMID41809475
PMCPMC12968690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.