ArticleSurgery open science2026
The impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic changes in frailty and related factors in older patients with liver cancer: A latent transition analysis approach.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal, evidence-based pathways designed to attenuate the surgical stress response and accelerate recovery. While ERAS principles have been successfully applied in various surgeries, the impact of overall protocol compliance on outcomes after liver resection, a procedure with unique physiological demands, requires further elucidation. This study aimed to assess the effect of adherence to an ERAS protocol on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 156 patients who underwent elective hepatectomy at a single center from 2020 to 2024. All patients were managed according to a standardized 20-item ERAS protocol. Overall compliance was calculated as the percentage of protocol elements delivered per patient. Patients were stratified into high-compliance, defined as 70% or greater, with 98 patients, and low-compliance, defined as less than 70%, with 58 patients, based on the median compliance rate. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications within 30 days, graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, postoperative ileus, readmission rate, and Comprehensive Complication Index. Results: The high-compliance group demonstrated significantly fewer overall complications, 24.5% versus 50.0%, and major complications, 6.1% versus 19.0%. The median length of stay was substantially shorter in the high-compliance group, 6 days compared to 9 days. Multivariate analysis identified high ERAS compliance as an independent protective factor against major complications, with an odds ratio of 0.32, and prolonged length of stay, with an odds ratio of 0.24. Time to gastrointestinal recovery was also faster in the high-compliance group. The overall readmission rate was similar between groups. Conclusions: High overall compliance with a multimodal ERAS protocol is independently associated with reduced postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay following hepatectomy. These findings underscore the importance of strict adherence to ERAS elements throughout the perioperative journey. Efforts should be directed towards optimizing compliance through multidisciplinary teamwork and patient engagement to maximize the benefits of ERAS pathways in liver surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.