ArticleSAGE open nursing
BOOST 2.0: Feasibility of Using the Nursing Student Workforce to Increase Activity: A Qualitative Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can nursing students boost exercise therapy in a subacute ward? An implementation study.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the experiences of patients, carers, nursing students, and health care workers of the BOOST 2.0 implementation trial in the subacute geriatric rehabilitation ward and understand the factors influencing uptake and sustainability. Methods: This research is a qualitative study using a thematic analysis approach. Semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted with various stakeholders who were involved in the implementation trial. A total of 11 focus groups and 31 individual interviews were included in the present study, which were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using reflexive thematic analysis. After themes were constructed using open coding, they were presented using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participant validation was conducted with members of the research team who were not involved with coding to ensure accuracy of the research findings. Results: Three key themes were developed: (1) perceptions about the BOOST 2.0 intervention, (2) perceptions of the implementation strategy of BOOST 2.0, (3) BOOST 2.0 within the inner (ward) and outer (hospital) setting Conclusion: This study provides insights into how the alternative health workforce can deliver health interventions in hospitals. Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of using a diverse clinical workforce to deliver interventions that can improve outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.