Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Complexity and psychopathology: from mechanistic science to a physical understanding of the mental conditions based on chaos and complexity.

Dimitri Marques Abramov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dimitri Marques AbramovLaboratório de Neurobiologia e Neurofisiologia Clínica, Instituto Nacional da Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Traditional Scientific Method (TSM), rooted in the Cartesian-Mechanistic Paradigm, is insufficient for the comprehensive study of the human mind and suffering, which are complex phenomena. Thus, psychiatry can pathologize many vital critical processes and neurodivergences when it simplifies subjectivity and diversity through its nosological models. This essay advocates for a shift towards the Complexity Paradigm (CP)to achieve a psychopathology more adequate to human singularity. The CP posits that life and mind are emergent dissipative phenomena arising from the synergy between chaos and order, that enables systems to adapt through self-organization while maintaining their internal stability. Therefore, organic complexity appears to decrease with age and pathologies. We explore Non-Extensive Statistical Mechanics (

Indexed as

complexitymechanismneurodivergencenon-extensive (Tsallis) statisticspsychopathologyreductionismself-organization

Identifiers

PMID41809413
PMCPMC12968282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.