ArticleJournal of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Wilmington, Del.)2025
At-Home High-Intensity Interval Training for Individuals with Paraplegia Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Wilmington, Del.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitophagy: A key regulator in the pathophysiology and treatment of spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 16-week at-home high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Method: Eight individuals (3 females) with chronic SCI below the sixth thoracic vertebrae participated in a 16-week at-home HIIT program using an arm ergometer. Participants completed baseline graded exercise tests to determine target heart rate zones. HIIT was prescribed three times per week. Each training session included six one-minute bouts with a target heart rate ~80% heart rate reserve (HRR), interspersed with two minutes of recovery (~30% HRR). A portable heart rate monitor and phone application provided visual feedback during training and allowed for measurements of adherence and compliance. Surveys were administered to assess participation, self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Results: Participants demonstrated a decrease in submaximal cardiac output by ~17% ( Conclusion: Participants demonstrated an improvement in cardiac efficiency during submaximal exercise, and maximal work capacity following at-home HIIT. Additionally, participant adherence, compliance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy metrics suggest that at-home HIIT was easily implemented and enjoyable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.