ArticlePhotoacoustics2026
Assessing dyspnea severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using intercostal muscle ultrasound/photoacoustic multimodal imaging.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the feasibility of ultrasound/photoacoustic imaging (US/PAI) for assessing dyspnea severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by concurrently evaluating intercostal muscle oxygenation and morphology. Methods: In this retrospective study, participants who underwent US/PAI examination between January 2024 and September 2024 were stratified into three groups: Group 1 (non-COPD controls), Group 2 (COPD with modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] ≤1), and Group 3 (COPD with mMRC >1). US/PAI was performed on the right intercostal muscles. Gray-scale ultrasound measured muscle thickness, while PAI quantified oxygen saturation (SO₂). Diagnostic performance of thickness, SO₂, and combined diagnosis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC). Results: In total, 103 participants were included: 20, 32, and 51 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Intercostal muscle thickness measured by B-mode ultrasound decreased with severity (Group 1: 4.1 ± 0.5 mm; Group 2: 3.0 ± 0.8 mm; Group 3: 2.8 ± 0.8 mm), paralleled by a decline in SO₂ obtained from PAI (78.2 ± 0.8%, 68.8 ± 6.0%, 63.2 ± 7.2%). Between non-COPD and all COPD patients, SO₂ (cut-off 71.2%) achieved an AUC of 0.960, versus 0.926 for thickness (cut-off 3.5 mm). For Group 1 vs. Group 2, the respective AUCs were 0.939 (SO₂ cut-off 71.3%) and 0.890 (thickness cut-off 3.5 mm). For Group 2 vs. Group 3, AUCs were 0.761 (SO₂ cut-off 64.4%) and 0.608 (thickness cut-off 3.1 mm). Critically, the combination of thickness and SO₂ consistently yielded a higher diagnostic AUC than thickness alone across all group. Conclusion: The oxygenation and mass of intercostal muscles, measured by US/PAI, are negatively correlated with the dyspnea severity of COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.