ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2026
Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting postoperative survival in gastric cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of postoperative survival is crucial for the personalized management of gastric cancer. However, the development of robust predictive models is often constrained by incomplete clinical data, while their clinical utility is limited by poor interpretability and the absence of practical applications.
aimTo develop an interpretable machine learning model for predicting 3-year survival following gastric cancer surgery. A novel data imputation method was proposed to handle missing values, and a user-friendly online tool was developed to facilitate clinical decision-making.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a group of 304 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. A hybrid imputation method (HDI-MF-Gower) was developed and compared against conventional techniques. Key prognostic factors were identified by integrating least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression with the Boruta algorithm. Subsequently, ten machine learning models were trained and validated.
resultsThe proposed HDI-MF-Gower method demonstrated superior imputation accuracy. Seven features were selected for the final model. The extra trees classifier achieved the best performance on the independent validation set, with an area under the curve of 0.853 and an accuracy of 0.772. The optimal model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis and deployed as an online prediction tool.
conclusionA robust and interpretable predictive model integrating advanced data imputation was successfully developed. The deployed tool facilitates individualized prognostic assessment and shows potential for enhancing personalized treatment planning in gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.