Trial reportWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2026
Perioperative multidisciplinary nursing model for endoscopic gastric submucosal dissection development and effect evaluation.
Trial report in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), offering high
aimTo construct ESD for patients with EGC assisted by digestive endoscopy, the perioperative MDT nursing model for ESD treatment was adopted, and its effect was evaluated.
methodsA total of 99 patients diagnosed with EGC in our hospital from April 2022 to April 2025 were prospectively selected as the observation group research subjects to receive the MDT nursing mode. Another 99 patients were selected in a 1:1 ratio as the control group to receive the conventional nursing mode. Both groups received ESD treatment. The recovery of intestinal rumbling sounds after surgery, the time of first getting out of bed for activities, the average length of hospital stay, and the satisfaction situation were compared between the two groups.
resultsIntergroup comparisons revealed that the observation group patients had significantly better outcomes in terms of time to bowel sound recovery (12.53 ± 1.21) hours, first time out of bed activity (23.53 ± 2.34) hours, length of hospital stay (6.63 ± 0.46) days, and overall complication rate (3.03%), along with a significantly higher satisfaction rate of 100% compared to 80.81% in the control group (
conclusionMDT can significantly promote the recovery of EGC patients after ESD treatment assisted by digestive endoscopy, improve the treatment effect of patients, and increase patient satisfaction. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.