ArticleCureus2026
A Randomized Exploratory Study Comparing the Success Rate of Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterization With a Curved Tip Needle Versus a Conventional Straight Needle in Adult Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCentral venous catheter insertion is routinely performed in adults with high success rates under ultrasound guidance, but guidewire advancement can be difficult in patients with small-caliber veins, particularly in neonates and infants. This randomized exploratory study in adult patients evaluates whether a curved-tip needle, conceptually designed for use in smaller veins, performs at least as well as a standard needle in internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation.
methodsIn this prospective, randomized exploratory study, adult patients requiring ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation for any indication were included. Forty participants were randomized into two groups: the curved group (CG), using a curved tip needle (10°), and the standard group (SG), using a conventional straight needle. The primary outcome was the first pass success rate. Secondary objectives were overall success rate, number of attempts, needle visualization, and complications.
resultsResults were similar in both the CG and SG in terms of first pass success rate (95%), overall success rate (100%), and number of attempts. Needle visualization under ultrasound was similar in both groups. No complications were noted in either group.
conclusionUse of a curved tip needle for IJV catheterization in adults showed similar success rates and needle visualization compared with a conventional straight needle, with no added complications. Further research may explore its utility in non-operative settings, in smaller caliber veins, and at alternative central venous sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.