ArticleCureus2026
Multisystem Disease With Suspected Malignancy: Clinical Management Following Diagnostic Refusal.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Follow‑up of older adults in primary care often entails clinical challenges that go beyond diagnosis. Comorbidities, functional limitations, and social vulnerabilities require a holistic, person‑centred approach grounded in a continuous and trusting doctor-patient relationship. We present a case of an 88-year-old man followed in Family Medicine consultations, who presented with cervical and abdominal skin lesions evolving over three months. Imaging findings were highly suggestive of disseminated oncologic disease. Two biopsies were performed, but no definitive diagnosis was reached. After a clear clinical explanation regarding diagnostic hypotheses and likely disease progression, the patient refused further aetiological investigations. Respecting the principle of autonomy, the clinical management strategy shifted towards continuous follow‑up, adaptation of the therapeutic plan, and a referral to palliative care was proposed. This case underlines the importance of individualised care and adherence to ethical principles, particularly patient autonomy, when diagnostic investigation is declined. It illustrates how primary care physicians can maintain clinical oversight and deliver quality care when faced with diagnostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.