Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809284›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Multisystem Disease With Suspected Malignancy: Clinical Management Following Diagnostic Refusal.

Márcia Moreira Costa, Anabela Andrade, Ana Raquel Dias, Marta Henriques Baptista, Afonso Carvalhal

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Márcia Moreira CostaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, USF Senhora de Vagos, Vagos, PRT.
Anabela AndradeFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, USF Senhora de Vagos, Vagos, PRT.
Ana Raquel DiasFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, USF Senhora de Vagos, Vagos, PRT.
Marta Henriques BaptistaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, USF Senhora de Vagos, Vagos, PRT.
Afonso CarvalhalFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, USF Senhora de Vagos, Vagos, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follow‑up of older adults in primary care often entails clinical challenges that go beyond diagnosis. Comorbidities, functional limitations, and social vulnerabilities require a holistic, person‑centred approach grounded in a continuous and trusting doctor-patient relationship. We present a case of an 88-year-old man followed in Family Medicine consultations, who presented with cervical and abdominal skin lesions evolving over three months. Imaging findings were highly suggestive of disseminated oncologic disease. Two biopsies were performed, but no definitive diagnosis was reached. After a clear clinical explanation regarding diagnostic hypotheses and likely disease progression, the patient refused further aetiological investigations. Respecting the principle of autonomy, the clinical management strategy shifted towards continuous follow‑up, adaptation of the therapeutic plan, and a referral to palliative care was proposed. This case underlines the importance of individualised care and adherence to ethical principles, particularly patient autonomy, when diagnostic investigation is declined. It illustrates how primary care physicians can maintain clinical oversight and deliver quality care when faced with diagnostic uncertainty.

Indexed as

continuity of patient carediagnostic uncertaintypalliative carepatient autonomyprimary health careshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41809284
PMCPMC12969753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.