ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Effect of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05%: Results from a Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 4 Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05%) and cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09%) are approved to increase tear production in dry eye disease (DED). We investigated the effect of CsA 0.09% on DED signs and symptoms in patients whose disease was inadequately controlled on CsA 0.05%. In this Phase 4, single-arm, open-label study, adults with DED administered 1 drop of CsA 0.09% in both eyes twice daily for 12 weeks. Patients and Methods: Patients were ≥ 18 years of age with a history and clinical diagnosis of DED for ≥ 3 months, which was not adequately controlled by treatment with CsA 0.05%. The primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) and modified Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (mSANDE) scores at Week 12. Secondary efficacy endpoints included mean changes from baseline in total conjunctival staining score, central CFS score, tear osmolarity, Schirmer test score, and frequency of artificial tear use at Week 12, and patient treatment preference at Week 12. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 124 patients (mean age, 65.6 years). The mean changes from baseline in total CFS and mSANDE scores were statistically significant at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 ( Conclusion: Treatment with CsA 0.09% elicited statistically significant improvement from baseline in DED signs and symptoms from Weeks 4 to 12 in patients inadequately controlled on CsA 0.05%. Overall, CsA 0.09% was well tolerated. The findings from this study suggest that switching from CsA 0.05% to CsA 0.09% may improve signs and symptoms in patients with DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.