SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for spasticity management and motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spasticity represents a primary motor impairment in children with cerebral palsy (CP), significantly impacting functional abilities and quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used to manage spasticity in children with CP, but questions remain about the magnitude, durability, and functional translation of benefits across heterogeneous trial designs. Objective: To quantify short-term effects of BoNT-A on spasticity and motor function and to synthesize trial evidence qualitatively across dosing strategies, limbs, and rehabilitation contexts. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January, 2015 to November 2025. Inclusion criteria specified randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating pharmacological interventions for spasticity and motor function in pediatric CP populations. Spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and gross motor function measured by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) were defined Results: The search identified 175 records, after removing 28 duplicates, 147 abstracts were screened, and 43 full-text articles were reviewed. A total of 18 RCTs met the inclusion criteria encompassing 892 participants. Quantitative meta-analysis of spasticity was conducted on a subset of five placebo-controlled lower-limb trials. BoNT-A significantly reduced ankle spasticity (MAS pooled mean difference: -0.31, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.19). The effect direction was unchanged when adding upper-limb dose-comparison and pragmatic designs, though heterogeneity increased. Functional synthesis (GMFM) included two trials (measuring GMFM-66 and GMFM-88 at 1-3 months) when BoNT-A was embedded within structured rehabilitation. Qualitative synthesis showed consistent short-term tone reduction across licensed doses, limited between-dose separation, attenuation by ~12 weeks, and an acceptable safety profile dominated by mild, transient events (e.g., injection site pain). Conclusion: BoNT-A provides statistically significant short-term reductions in spasticity, with preliminary evidence suggesting potential for early functional gains when combined with rehabilitation. Treatment effects are time-limited, requiring repeated administration. Upper limb applications show less consistent functional translation despite spasticity reduction. Evidence supports multimodal approaches combining pharmacological intervention with structured rehabilitation programs for optimal outcomes. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251182969, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251182969).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.