ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A neutrosophic explainable AI framework for modeling uncertainty in immersive stereotactic neurosurgical simulation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) has transformed medical education; however, performance assessment in high-stakes fields such as stereotactic neurosurgery remains largely dependent on binary or threshold-based metrics. In procedures such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), where safety margins are below 2 mm, these approaches fail to capture indeterminate behaviors, including hesitation, micro-instability, and unstable trajectories, potentially leading to false-positive competence classifications. This study introduces a Neutrosophic Explainable AI (N-XAI) framework that models surgical performance through three independent dimensions: truth (competence), Indeterminacy (instability/ambiguity), and Falsity (error). Performance is represented in a two-dimensional precision-stability space and quantified using single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS). For theoretical validation, a synthetic dataset comprising 60 simulated surgical attempts distributed across three skill groups (expert, indeterminate, and novice) was generated. Neutrosophic competence scores were computed and analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests. The framework successfully differentiated the three groups and identified indeterminate, high-risk cases that achieved acceptable spatial accuracy but exhibited significant instability-patterns that conventional metrics fail to detect. The proposed N-XAI framework provides a mathematically grounded and interpretable approach for modeling uncertainty in immersive neurosurgical simulation. By explicitly accounting for indeterminacy, it enhances the diagnostic value of VR-based training systems and lays the groundwork for future validation in live stereotactic simulation environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.