Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809177›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2026

Diagnostic dilemmas in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Navigating clinical and pathological loopholes.

Zain Tariq, Affan Faisal, Abdul Basit, Abdullah Iftikhar, Abdul M Basil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zain TariqDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Affan FaisalDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abdul BasitDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abdullah IftikharDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abdul M BasilDepartment of Medicine, Spinghar Medical University, Kabul 1001, Kābul, Afghanistan. abdulmaboodbasil@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and highly aggressive gastric cancer subtype characterized by hepatic morphological features and often elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Despite its distinct biology HAS frequently eludes early diagnosis due to nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, radiological mimicry of hepatocellular carcinoma, and variable expression of diagnostic biomarkers. Imaging modalities like CT and magnetic resonance imaging offer limited specificity, often misinterpreting hepatic metastases as primary liver tumors. While elevated AFP is a supportive clue, it lacks sensitivity and specificity, particularly in AFP-negative HAS. Histologically, HAS poses challenges with subtle or focal hepatoid differentiation, especially in limited biopsy samples. Immunohistochemical variability, especially inconsistent staining of markers like SALL4, Glypican-3, and HepPar-1, further complicates accurate classification. Misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate management and a worse prognosis. The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria globally exacerbates variability in reporting and treatment decisions. This review outlined the multidimensional diagnostic hurdles in HAS and underscored the necessity of an integrated, multidisciplinary approach. Enhanced tissue sampling, combined immunohistochemical panels, and emerging molecular tools may collectively improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes for this aggressive gastric malignancy.

Indexed as

Alpha-fetoproteinDiagnostic pitfallsGastric cancerHepatoid adenocarcinomaHistopathology

Identifiers

PMID41809177
PMCPMC12968757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.