Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809171›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2026

Addressing barriers and advancing equitable colorectal cancer screening in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning population.

Pavan Kumar Reddy Kalluru, Sai Sudha Valisekka, Yamini Katamreddy, Apoorva Cherukuri, Deekshitha Kuchi, Sowmya Manjari Siddenthi, Saikiran Mandyam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pavan Kumar Reddy KalluruDepartment of Gastroenterology, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA 92804, United States. dr.pavan96rdy@gmail.com.
Sai Sudha ValisekkaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Yamini KatamreddyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Apoorva CherukuriDepartment of Internal Medicine, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA 92804, United States.
Deekshitha KuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada 520008, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sowmya Manjari SiddenthiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shasta Regional Medical Center, Redding, CA 96001, United States.
Saikiran MandyamDepartment of Nephrology, Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ 07753, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent non-skin cancer, causing 8% of cancer-related deaths. The most effective way to decrease cancer morbidity and mortality is cancer screening. However, individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) are less likely to utilize cancer screening services compared to the general population. To understand the barriers to effective colorectal cancer screening in the LGBTQ+ population and recommend solutions, we conducted a critical review of the literature using multiple databases until March 2024 using search strings like "colorectal cancer", "screening", "LGBTQ+", "healthcare equity" and "barriers". We addressed the barriers at various levels, including patient, provider, institution, health insurance, healthcare policies, and data and population surveys. Our analysis indicates that the key contributing factors are social stigma, lack of provider awareness, and insufficient culturally competent care. We also recommend potential solutions such as provider training, increasing awareness and accessibility of screening services, and incorporating patient-centered care models. To achieve equitable access to colorectal cancer screening for the LGBTQ+ population, a holistic strategy involving healthcare professionals, lawmakers, and researchers is required. By identifying the challenges and solutions, this minireview aims to promote healthcare equity and better health outcomes for the LGBTQ+ population. Recommendations for future studies are also given to improve healthcare provision for the LGBTQ+ community.

Indexed as

Barriers to careColorectal cancerGender equalityGood health and well-beingHealthcare equityQuality educationReduced inequalities

Identifiers

PMID41809171
PMCPMC12968765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.