ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026
Nottingham Hip Fracture Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II: Predicting 30-day mortality in elderly hip fracture.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among older individuals. Accurate prediction of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery is crucial for effective resource allocation and patient management.
aimTo compare the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score in predicting 30-day mortality among 182 geriatric patients (≥ 60 years) undergoing elective hip fracture surgery at Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, India.
methodsNHFS and APACHE-II scores were calculated preoperatively. Patients were followed up for 30 days post-surgery to determine mortality outcomes. Statistical analysis, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was performed to assess the predictive accuracy of both scores.
resultsResults indicated that APACHE-II demonstrated superior predictive ability compared to NHFS. The study also assessed secondary outcomes such as ventilator and inotropic support, acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiac morbidity, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and length of hospital stay (LOS). APACHE-II showed superior performance in predicting the need for ventilator support and AKI.
conclusionBoth scores showed significant discrimination for ventilator and inotropic support and LOS but not for AKI. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive risk stratification for managing geriatric patients with hip fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.