ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Publications in Gender-Affirming Surgery.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender-affirming surgeries (GASs) serve as a fundamental treatment for gender dysphoria, with growing evidence of their benefits in both health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited articles in the field, to highlight impactful studies, research trends, and prominent authors. A search of the Web of Science database was conducted to identify the top 100 most-cited articles related to GAS. Bibliometric and visual analyses were performed using VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and Biblioshiny packages for R statistical software. The authors gathered and analyzed citation metrics, institutional networks, collaboration clusters, thematic keyword analysis, and author demographics. The 100 most-cited articles on GAS were published between 1980 and 2023, with an increase in both publication and citations after 2015. The thematic analysis demonstrated 2 primary research domains which focused on patient quality of life and surgical outcomes. The research institutions Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Johns Hopkins, and Ghent University led the field with Bouman and Mullender being among the most productive authors. The United States, together with the Netherlands emerged as dominant research centers with collaborative networks. Most studies were observational and reviews, with a mean evidence level of 3.05 and published primarily in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.