Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809072›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026

Arthroscopic distal clavicle autograft with suture button fixation for shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: a case series.

Lindsey Ruderman, Samuel Lorentz, Alaowei Y Amanah, Caroline Park, Damon V Briggs, Tom Doyle, Jonathan T Bravman, Robert T Tisherman, Christopher Klifto, Oke Anakwenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsey RudermanDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Samuel LorentzDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Alaowei Y AmanahDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Caroline ParkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Damon V BriggsDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Tom DoyleDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jonathan T BravmanDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Robert T TishermanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher KliftoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Oke AnakwenzeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Distal clavicle autograft (DCA) has garnered increasing popularity as a cost-effective and safe autograft for glenoid reconstruction in shoulder instability. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of a single-surgeon case series of patients managed with arthroscopic DCA for glenoid bone loss with suture button fixation at minimum follow-up of 1 year. Methods: All cases of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability treated with DCA by a single surgeon between January 2020 and December 2023 were reviewed. Patients were included if DCA was performed arthroscopically with 2 suture buttons for fixation, with minimum clinical follow-up of 1 year. Patients were evaluated post-operatively for recurrent instability or complications. Glenoid bone loss was measured using 3-dimensional reconstruction and best-fit circle methods on pre-operative computed tomography scans. Coracoclavicular (CC) distances were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively to assess for acromioclavicular joint instability and change in preoperative to post-operative CC distance was assessed with dependent Results: Eight patients were included. Average age was 32.6 years. There were 7 males and 1 female. At surgery, mean glenoid bone loss was 23.3% (range: 17.8%-30.8%). At harvest, the average length, thickness, and width of the DCA were 22.8 mm, 11.6 mm, and 11.3 mm, respectively. After preparation, the graft averaged 22.8 mm in length with a width and depth of 10 mm, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (range: 1.5-4.0 years), no patients had recurrent subluxation or dislocation. No evidence of CC ligament damage was noted; average preoperative and post-operative CC distances were 11.5 mm and 11.3 mm, respectively, with mean change of -0.7 mm (95% confidence interval: -4.8 to +3.4 mm, Conclusion: In this case series of patients who underwent arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction with DCA, we noted low complication rates and no evidence of recurrent instability.

Indexed as

Distal clavicle autograftGlenoid bone lossGlenoid defectGlenoid reconstructionRecurrent shoulder instabilityShoulder instabilitySuture button fixation

Identifiers

PMID41809072
PMCPMC12969827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.