ReviewBMC methods2026
A diffusion-based 3D printing strategy to fabricate self-supporting, perfusable networks.
Review in BMC methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Engineered vasculature is essential for the biofabrication of functional tissue mimics. To fabricate engineered vasculature, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising approach due to its ability to form perfusable structures with customized geometries. Sacrificial ink extrusion, where sacrificial inks are printed into a crosslinkable hydrogel precursor support bath, is a versatile bioprinting modality for fabricating interconnected perfusable networks. However, the fabrication of self-supporting structures with a vessel-like shell remains challenging using conventional sacrificial ink extrusion approaches. To enable the fabrication of self-supporting, perfusable networks, we developed a 3D bioprinting approach termed Gelation of Uniform Interfacial Diffusant in Embedded 3D Printing (GUIDE-3DP). This approach leverages the diffusion of crosslinking initiators from a printed sacrificial ink into a gel precursor support bath to generate branched, perfusable networks with precise control over channel inner and outer diameters. Methods: Here, we present an end-to-end protocol for fabricating self-supporting vascular-like networks using the GUIDE-3DP method. We describe methods for freeform print path design, support bath and sacrificial ink preparation, 3D printing of perfusable structures, and seeding of printed structures with endothelial cells. Through this protocol, perfusable structures with complex branching geometries can be designed, fabricated, and endothelialized. Discussion: To highlight the ability of GUIDE-3DP to fabricate self-supporting, perfusable networks with complex geometries, we demonstrate the fabrication of three representative structures: (1) an interconnected retinal vasculature network, (2) a hierarchical branched vascular network, and (3) a dual-material capillary-like network. We further demonstrate the endothelialization of printed structures with one or two cell types via single- or dual-material printing. Beyond vascular-like networks, this protocol is readily adaptable to design and fabricate mimics of other perfusable structures in the human body. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44330-026-00059-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.