Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808997›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Nicotine causes highly localized and tuned changes in thalamocortical gain that cascade strongly and selectively through the cortical circuit.

Veronica C Galvin, Anita A Disney

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veronica C GalvinDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710.
Anita A DisneyDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-0681

Funding

Bi-directional, task-dependent control of thalamic input gain, in layer 4c of the primary visual cortex, by the cholinergic and serotonergic neuromodulatory systems.R01EY029663 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DISNEY, ANITA A · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Probing D2 and 5HT-2A mechanisms in early visual processing in V1F32EY034772 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVIN, VERONICA · 2023 to 2025
$226k
Cholinergic mechanisms in visual spatial attentionF32EY021122 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI DISNEY, ANITA A · 2010 to 2010
$24k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY021122NEI NIH HHS F32 EY034772NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In layer 4 of the primary sensory cortices, sensory data meets contextual information carried by modulatory systems, establishing a potentially important point of control. Accordingly, modulatory receptor expression at this point often differs from other nearby layers and cortical areas. Altering the processing state at even a small number of layer 4 thalamocortical synapses should be impactful on downstream processing, as this is the point at which most information about the outside world enters cortex. It is, however, often assumed-based on diffuse innervation of cortex by subcortical nuclei, and dense receptor expression in the association cortices-that modulatory signals are shared across large swaths of tissue, with the primary site of action being in 'higher' levels of cortex. Hypothesizing that modifying the feedforward input to cortex might be an important capability of the cholinergic system, we recorded across the depth of cortex while delivering nicotine to a small proportion of thalamocortical synapses in macaque primary visual cortex, leveraging selective receptor expression to achieve spatial control. We observed bidirectional response changes throughout all layers, including layers in which nicotine is known to have no effect when applied locally. The pattern of these changes carried the signature of having passed through a normalizing circuit, rather than signatures of drug spread: the magnitude and tuning dependence of the response changes were well-accounted for by a normalization model with a tuned, multiplicative gain field. The circuit apparently did not compensate these changes; perceived contrast in a behavioral task was biased with the same normalization-predicted tuning dependence.

Identifiers

PMID41808997
PMCPMC12970333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.