ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026
Surgical Management of Esthesioneuroblastoma at a Single Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze management strategies and outcomes for patients with esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) undergoing surgical resection at a single institution. Methods: Retrospective review from 1971 to 2022 from a single, high-volume tertiary academic center of all patients with ENB. Results: A total of 60 patients received their primary treatment for ENB at our institution. The average age at diagnosis was 52 years (range 13-91), and most were male (66.7%) with Kadish C (61.7%) stage at presentation. Most patients were treated with an open approach (68.3%) compared with a purely endoscopic approach (31.7%). Median follow-up was 96.9 months (mean 118.8 months, interquartile range 28.4-183.8 months). There was one patient with local recurrence in the endoscopic cohort (5.3%) compared with 22.0% (9 patients) among those who underwent an open resection ( Conclusion: The surgical approach for ENB resection is dictated by tumor extension. Endoscopic resection offers a less invasive approach with comparable postoperative outcomes in appropriately selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.