ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026
Vestibular Schwannomas in Pregnancy: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors, the majority of which are indolent and managed conservatively with active surveillance. VS during pregnancy is rare and poorly understood. It is unclear whether hormonal changes during pregnancy contribute to VS growth. Currently, the largest case series describing VS during pregnancy comprises six cases from the Mayo Clinic in 1993, where they note that tumors tend to be larger and associated with higher surgical morbidity. We present five further cases of peripartum VS and their management strategies. Design: A retrospective review of 540 consecutive patients with sporadic VS at St George's Hospital from 2017 to 2023 was performed. Setting: St George's Hospital is a tertiary hospital in London providing joint neurosurgical and ENT management of VS. Participants: A total of 280 out of 540 patients were female (52%), and 5 were either pregnant at presentation or had given birth within 6 months of presentation (1%). Main Outcome Measures: Maternal/infant well-being, postoperative complications, and facial nerve function were our main outcome measures. Results: All patients had tumors >30 mm requiring translabyrinthine resection. One underwent VS resection with intraoperative lactation breaks 1 week following elective cesarean section. Two required cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts to delay resection. One had her resection while 21 weeks pregnant. All had intact postoperative facial nerve function and healthy babies. One experienced a CSF leak requiring a lumbar drain. Conclusion: Because pregnancy tends to be associated with large tumors and surgery is complicated by obstetric considerations, appropriate counselling should be given to women of childbearing age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.