ArticleCirculation reports2026
Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caregivers of patients with heart failure (HF) provide self-care support. Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) version 2 assesses the caregiver's contribution (CC) to self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management of patients with HF. We translated CC-SCHFI version 2 into Japanese and evaluated its psychometric properties. Methods and Results: This cross-sectional study enrolled Japanese caregivers of patients with HF. To determine structural validity, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using the structure of the original version. Convergent validity assessed the association between each scale and self-efficacy. For internal consistency, model-based internal consistency coefficients were calculated. The participants were 103 caregivers. Regarding structural validity, the original 2-factor structure was appropriate for the CC to self-care maintenance scale. In contrast, due to model instability or low discriminant validity, 1-factor models with modifications were adopted for the CC to symptom perception and self-care management scales, showing an acceptable fit. Regarding convergent validity, all scales showed significant associations with self-efficacy. Model-based internal consistency coefficients were sufficient for all scales (0.803, 0.888, and 0.861 for the CC to self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management scales, respectively). Conclusions: The Japanese CC-SCHFI version 2 is a reliable and valid scale for assessing the CC to self-care in Japanese patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.