ArticleBMJ public health2026
Factors influencing decision-making for facility-based childbirth in rural Nepal: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Women's health insurance and institutional delivery in Nepal: Results of the 2022 Nepal demographic Health Survey.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Maternal mortality remains a major global health challenge, with most preventable deaths occurring in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Despite progress in reducing maternal mortality, Nepal continues to face challenges in achieving universal facility-based childbirth. Understanding how decisions about place of childbirth are made, particularly in rural settings, is critical to reducing delays in accessing obstetric care. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in two rural districts of Nepal. Using purposive sampling, thirty-four semistructured interviews were conducted with women who had given birth within the previous twelve months, along with their husbands and mothers-in-law. In addition, nine key informant interviews were held with healthcare providers and local authorities, and eight focus group discussions were conducted with women, men, health workers and community stakeholders. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated and analysed using a thematic approach combining bottom-up coding and topic guide-based categories. Results: Decision-making regarding place of childbirth was found to be dynamic and shaped by multiple factors across pregnancy and labour. While women were increasingly involved in decision-making during pregnancy, authority frequently shifted to husbands and mothers-in-law once labour began. Fear of complications, prior obstetric experiences, perceived competence of healthcare providers and community influence strongly affected care-seeking decisions. Despite reported birth preparedness, many women were unable to reach health facilities in a timely manner due to delayed recognition of labour, hesitancy to seek care at night, family influence and structural barriers. Conclusions: Decision-making around facility-based childbirth in rural Nepal is strongly influenced by family and community dynamics, particularly during labour. Interventions should prioritise family-centred antenatal counselling, engagement of husbands and key family members, and strengthening trust in health services. Improving service quality and addressing structural barriers are essential to promote timely utilisation of facility-based childbirth services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.