Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808897›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Integrating neural, physiological, and interoceptive measures in social interaction.

Giada Lettieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giada LettieriAffective Physiology and Interoception Group, MoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interaction is not simply the meeting of two brains, but the emergent product of continuously coupled brain-body systems within and between individuals. Hyper scanning studies have shown that interacting partners exhibit inter-brain synchrony during cooperation, conversation, and joint attention, consolidating neural coupling as a marker of shared engagement. Yet neural data alone cannot tell us whether individuals are aligned in their emotions, arousal, or regulatory strategies, nor how these states evolve in real time. In parallel, work on physiological synchrony has revealed that partners' autonomic signals also converge during interaction, tracking rapport, cohesion, and cooperative success. Interoception, the sensing and representation of internal bodily signals, provides a conceptual bridge between these levels. Atypical interoceptive processing is increasingly implicated across conditions marked by social difficulties, and emerging hyper scanning studies show that directing attention to bodily rhythms can enhance both autonomic and neural alignment. In this Perspective, I argue for a framework in which social behavior arises from multilevel coupling among neural activity, autonomic physiology, and interoceptive processes. I outline how multimodal hyperscanning in naturalistic tasks, combined with temporally sensitive analyses, can clarify when and how these levels interact, from dyads to groups. Finally, I discuss clinical and developmental horizons in which multimodal synchrony serves both as a mechanistic readout and a potential target for interventions that stabilize internal dynamics to support social connection.

Indexed as

brain-body couplinghyper scanninginter-brain synchronyinteroceptionphysiological synchronysocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID41808897
PMCPMC12968177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.