ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Integrating neural, physiological, and interoceptive measures in social interaction.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous bidirectional coupling of heart rate variability and emotions in dyad speaker-listener dynamics reveals unique interpersonal synchronization.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Regulatory flexibility under pressure: an asymmetric brain-body model of leadership in high-stakes teams.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social interaction is not simply the meeting of two brains, but the emergent product of continuously coupled brain-body systems within and between individuals. Hyper scanning studies have shown that interacting partners exhibit inter-brain synchrony during cooperation, conversation, and joint attention, consolidating neural coupling as a marker of shared engagement. Yet neural data alone cannot tell us whether individuals are aligned in their emotions, arousal, or regulatory strategies, nor how these states evolve in real time. In parallel, work on physiological synchrony has revealed that partners' autonomic signals also converge during interaction, tracking rapport, cohesion, and cooperative success. Interoception, the sensing and representation of internal bodily signals, provides a conceptual bridge between these levels. Atypical interoceptive processing is increasingly implicated across conditions marked by social difficulties, and emerging hyper scanning studies show that directing attention to bodily rhythms can enhance both autonomic and neural alignment. In this Perspective, I argue for a framework in which social behavior arises from multilevel coupling among neural activity, autonomic physiology, and interoceptive processes. I outline how multimodal hyperscanning in naturalistic tasks, combined with temporally sensitive analyses, can clarify when and how these levels interact, from dyads to groups. Finally, I discuss clinical and developmental horizons in which multimodal synchrony serves both as a mechanistic readout and a potential target for interventions that stabilize internal dynamics to support social connection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.