ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Stakeholder views on the installation and use of mile long tracks in community parks aimed at increasing physical activity in low-income minority areas: A qualitative evaluation in Birmingham UK.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Physical activity (PA) is essential for preventing and managing chronic diseases and improving mental health. Despite national guidelines recommending regular PA, significant disparities exist across demographic groups and regions in the UK, with Birmingham and the West Midlands reporting some of the lowest activity levels. We aimed to explore the development, implementation, and perceived value of Every Step Matters (ESM) tracks-mile-long walking routes installed in eight Birmingham parks situated in neighbourhoods with high deprivation and ethnic diversity. Study design: Qualitative evaluation. Methods: Data were collected from 35 participants through ten in-depth interviews and four focus groups, including community members, track users, and stakeholders from the Birmingham City Council (BCC) Public Health team and a physical activity charity based in the West Midlands who work with communities from a range of socio-economic backgrounds and ethnicities in urban areas. Rapid qualitative analysis was undertaken. Results: Seven themes were identified: (1) use of the tracks, (2) promoting use, (3) increasing appeal, (4) perceived benefits, (5) barriers, (6) sustainability, and (7) interactions between the Public Health team and the PA charity partner. While the tracks were viewed as inclusive, low-cost, and beneficial for health and community cohesion, barriers such as safety concerns, low motivation, and poor maintenance were identified. Recommendations include improving awareness, addressing safety, promoting group activities, and ensuring long-term sustainability. Conclusions: The ESM tracks show promise as a community-based intervention to promote PA in disadvantaged areas. However, sustained impact requires strategic planning, community ownership, and targeted support. Further research is needed to explore adherence, guided versus non-guided use, and the role of social determinants in PA engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.