ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Risk assessment of drug-associated miscarriage using XGBoost and SHAP explainability: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychiatric Safety Signals of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A FAERS-Based Pharmacovigilance Study with Explainable Machine Learning.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Model for Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Elderly Patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Miscarriage is a common and serious adverse pregnancy outcome. Assessing drug-associated miscarriage risk is essential for medication safety in pregnancy. Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System this study systematically mined adverse drug events related to miscarriage and combined machine learning with explainable Artificial Intelligence to evaluate potential high-risk drugs. Methods: We retrieved FAERS reports of miscarriage-associated ADEs from 2005 to 2024. Disproportionality analyses were conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), with subgroup analyses by age and body weight. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict miscarriage risk, and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Finally, Weibull distribution modeling characterized the time-to-onset (TTO) from drug exposure to miscarriage. Results: A total of 36,389 ADEs were included. We identified several potential high-risk classes, notably immunomodulators, psychoactive/neuroactive agents, and antimicrobials. The XGBoost model showed favorable discrimination with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.738. SHAP analysis reveals that immunomodulatory factors, such as adalimumab and infliximab, are significant predictors of miscarriage events in this model. The distribution of their SHAP values suggests a strong association between these drugs and miscarriage reports. time-to-onset analyses suggested that most miscarriages occurred within 2 years after drug exposure, with marked heterogeneity in risk timing across agents; anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha drugs (TNF-α) exhibited a higher early risk. Conclusion: Machine learning and SHAP interpretability analysis based on the FAERS database effectively identified immunomodulators, antiviral drugs, and psychiatric/neuropsychiatric medications as potential risk signals associated with miscarriage. These findings underscore the need for individualized medication assessment that considers patient age and body weight, providing evidence-based guidance and early alerting for reference for drug risk assessment during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.