ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Prospective evaluation of medication-related problems and pharmacist interventions in liver transplant recipients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of clinical pharmacist-led medication management and education on tacrolimus therapeutic control.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are a common patient safety issue among hospitalized individuals, often associated with reduced quality of life, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality. Due to the chronic and complex nature of post-transplant care, liver transplant recipients are particularly vulnerable to MRPs. Clinical pharmacists play a critical role in identifying and resolving MRPs, thereby promoting the rational use of medications. The objective of this study was to characterize MRPs among liver transplant recipients and assess the clinical determinants associated with their occurrence. Method: This prospective study was conducted between 5 October 2023 to 31 April 2024 at the Liver Transplantation Institute. A total of 373 hospitalized liver transplant recipients in inpatient wards and intensive care units who were receiving at least one medication were included. Donors and patients not receiving any medication were excluded. The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification system version 9.1 was used to categorize MRPs. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with and without MRPs were compared statistically and risk factors were analyzed through logistic regression. Results: Among the 373 patients included in this study, at least one MRP was identified in 311 patients, yielding 620 MRPs in total. A total of 620 interventions were proposed, of which 547 (88.2%) were accepted, while 73 (11.8%) were rejected. The leading causes of MRPs was "dose selection" (C3) was the most common cause (44.2%), followed by "drug selection" (C1) at 26.1%. The presence of at least one comorbidity and acute kidney injury were significant risk factors for the occurrence of MRPs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive study applying the PCNE v.9.1 method to liver transplant recipients hospitalized in both ward and intensive care unit settings. The most prevalent MRPs were related to "treatment effectiveness," primarily caused by "dose selection" and "drug selection." Clinical pharmacists and physicians should particularly focus on these aspects when reviewing transplant patients' medication regimens. The results achieved in this study suggest that clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing new medications to transplant recipients with at least one comorbidity and a history of acute kidney injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.