Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Prospective evaluation of medication-related problems and pharmacist interventions in liver transplant recipients.

Sena Güzel Karahan, Mefküre Durmuş, Ahmet Çakır, Zeynep Ülkü Gün, Sezai Yılmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sena Güzel KarahanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Mefküre DurmuşDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Ahmet ÇakırDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Zeynep Ülkü GünDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Trakya University, Edirne, Türkiye.
Sezai YılmazDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are a common patient safety issue among hospitalized individuals, often associated with reduced quality of life, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality. Due to the chronic and complex nature of post-transplant care, liver transplant recipients are particularly vulnerable to MRPs. Clinical pharmacists play a critical role in identifying and resolving MRPs, thereby promoting the rational use of medications. The objective of this study was to characterize MRPs among liver transplant recipients and assess the clinical determinants associated with their occurrence. Method: This prospective study was conducted between 5 October 2023 to 31 April 2024 at the Liver Transplantation Institute. A total of 373 hospitalized liver transplant recipients in inpatient wards and intensive care units who were receiving at least one medication were included. Donors and patients not receiving any medication were excluded. The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification system version 9.1 was used to categorize MRPs. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with and without MRPs were compared statistically and risk factors were analyzed through logistic regression. Results: Among the 373 patients included in this study, at least one MRP was identified in 311 patients, yielding 620 MRPs in total. A total of 620 interventions were proposed, of which 547 (88.2%) were accepted, while 73 (11.8%) were rejected. The leading causes of MRPs was "dose selection" (C3) was the most common cause (44.2%), followed by "drug selection" (C1) at 26.1%. The presence of at least one comorbidity and acute kidney injury were significant risk factors for the occurrence of MRPs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive study applying the PCNE v.9.1 method to liver transplant recipients hospitalized in both ward and intensive care unit settings. The most prevalent MRPs were related to "treatment effectiveness," primarily caused by "dose selection" and "drug selection." Clinical pharmacists and physicians should particularly focus on these aspects when reviewing transplant patients' medication regimens. The results achieved in this study suggest that clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing new medications to transplant recipients with at least one comorbidity and a history of acute kidney injury.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacyintensive careliver transplantmedication-related problemsPharmaceutical Care Network Europe

Identifiers

PMID41808868
PMCPMC12968275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.